Bangladesh vs Estonia: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Bangladesh
29.85
in 2024
Estonia
32.51
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
75th
Estonia rank
72nd
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Bangladesh
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 32.51 against 29.85 in Bangladesh, a difference of 2.66.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Estonia ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 75th and Estonia ranks 72nd of 201 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.93 | 57.69 | 34.76 | Estonia |
| 2020s | 58.9 | 64.84 | 5.93 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Bangladesh or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 32.51 against 29.85 in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Bangladesh and Estonia?
- 2.66, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Estonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Estonia rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Bangladesh ranks 75th and Estonia ranks 72nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.