Belarus vs Costa Rica: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Belarus
45.31
in 2024
Costa Rica
35.41
in 2023
Belarus rank
66th
Costa Rica rank
69th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Belarus
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 45.31 against 35.41 in Costa Rica, a difference of 9.9.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Belarus ranks 66th and Costa Rica ranks 69th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.65 | 21.04 | 3.39 | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 31.96 | 22.19 | 9.77 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Belarus or Costa Rica?
- Belarus, at 45.31 against 35.41 in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 9.9, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Costa Rica rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Belarus ranks 66th and Costa Rica ranks 69th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.