Belarus vs Mauritius: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Belarus
45.31
in 2024
Mauritius
37.98
in 2022
Belarus rank
66th
Mauritius rank
68th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Belarus
- Mauritius
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 45.31 against 37.98 in Mauritius, a difference of 7.33.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 66th and Mauritius ranks 68th of 201 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 44.77 | 12.17 | 32.6 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 30.8 | 23.89 | 6.91 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Belarus or Mauritius?
- Belarus, at 45.31 against 37.98 in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Belarus and Mauritius?
- 7.33, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mauritius?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Belarus and Mauritius rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Belarus ranks 66th and Mauritius ranks 68th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.