Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Belarus
45.31
in 2024
Sri Lanka
62.23
in 2024
Belarus rank
66th
Sri Lanka rank
63rd
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Belarus
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 62.23 against 45.31 in Belarus, a difference of 16.92.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.4 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Belarus ranks 66th and Sri Lanka ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41.91 | 17.31 | 24.6 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 34.63 | 55.67 | 21.04 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Belarus or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 62.23 against 45.31 in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Belarus and Sri Lanka?
- 16.92, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sri Lanka?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Sri Lanka rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Belarus ranks 66th and Sri Lanka ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.