Belgium vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Belgium
215.55
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa
12.82
in 2024
Belgium rank
32nd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
30th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Belgium
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 215.55 against 12.82 in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 202.73.
That makes Belgium's figure about 16.8 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 32nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 30th of 201 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 243.59 | 8.55 | 235.05 | Belgium |
| 2020s | 369.94 | 15.54 | 354.4 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Belgium or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Belgium, at 215.55 against 12.82 in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 202.73, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Belgium ranks 32nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 30th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.