Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.05
in 2024
Congo
2.17
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
116th
Congo rank
115th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 2.17 against 2.05 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.12.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Congo ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 116th and Congo ranks 115th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4262 | 72.09 | 71.66 | Congo |
| 2020s | 4.55 | 2.91 | 1.64 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Congo?
- Congo, at 2.17 against 2.05 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?
- 0.12, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 116th and Congo ranks 115th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.