Botswana vs Congo: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Botswana
2.45 current US$
in 2024
Congo
2.17 current US$
in 2024
Botswana rank
113th
Congo rank
115th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Botswana
- Congo
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 2.45 current US$ against 2.17 current US$ in Congo, a difference of 0.28 current US$.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Congo ahead.
Botswana ranks 113th and Congo ranks 115th of 201 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.82 current US$ | 72.09 current US$ | 49.27 current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 1.68 current US$ | 2.91 current US$ | 1.23 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Botswana or Congo?
- Botswana, at 2.45 current US$ against 2.17 current US$ in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Botswana and Congo?
- 0.28 current US$, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Botswana ranks 113th and Congo ranks 115th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.