Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Botswana
2.45
in 2024
Zimbabwe
3.19
in 2024
Botswana rank
113th
Zimbabwe rank
111th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Botswana
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 3.19 against 2.45 in Botswana, a difference of 0.74.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Botswana ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.82 | 85.74 | 62.92 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1.68 | 1.61 | 0.0659 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Botswana or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 3.19 against 2.45 in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Botswana and Zimbabwe?
- 0.74, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Zimbabwe rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Botswana ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.