Chile vs Pakistan: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Chile
30.98
in 2024
Pakistan
28.98
in 2024
Chile rank
73rd
Pakistan rank
76th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Chile
- Pakistan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 30.98 against 28.98 in Pakistan, a difference of 2.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 73rd and Pakistan ranks 76th of 201 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 43.48 | 29.38 | 14.09 | Chile |
| 2020s | 62.07 | 42.44 | 19.63 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Chile or Pakistan?
- Chile, at 30.98 against 28.98 in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Chile and Pakistan?
- 2, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Pakistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Pakistan rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Chile ranks 73rd and Pakistan ranks 76th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.