China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Portugal: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
1.33
in 2024
Portugal
211.97
in 2024
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank
35th
Portugal rank
33rd

Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time

  • China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  • Portugal
0100200300400201020172024

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 211.97 against 1.33 in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a difference of 210.64.

That makes Portugal's figure about 159.8 times China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 35th and Portugal ranks 33rd of 37 groups.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Portugal Difference Ahead
2010s 0.5882 33.98 33.4 Portugal
2020s 3.7 216.61 212.91 Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or Portugal?
Portugal, at 211.97 against 1.33 in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Portugal?
210.64, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Portugal?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Portugal rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 35th and Portugal ranks 33rd of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Portugal: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-subsidies-consumption-and-production-per-capita-nominal-united-states-dollars/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-subsidies-consumption-and-production-per-capita-nominal-united-states-dollars/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/portugal/">China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Portugal: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
238 places, 3,358 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed