Ecuador vs South Africa: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Ecuador
105.36
in 2024
South Africa
120.37
in 2024
Ecuador rank
51st
South Africa rank
48th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 120.37 against 105.36 in Ecuador, a difference of 15.01.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 51st and South Africa ranks 48th of 201 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 240.13 | 81.02 | 159.11 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 120.14 | 102.5 | 17.65 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Ecuador or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 120.37 against 105.36 in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 15.01, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 51st and South Africa ranks 48th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.