Ecuador vs Sweden: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Ecuador
105.36
in 2024
Sweden
97.76
in 2024
Ecuador rank
51st
Sweden rank
52nd
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Sweden
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 105.36 against 97.76 in Sweden, a difference of 7.6.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sweden ahead.
Ecuador ranks 51st and Sweden ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 240.13 | 203.37 | 36.76 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 120.14 | 151.26 | 31.11 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Ecuador or Sweden?
- Ecuador, at 105.36 against 97.76 in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Ecuador and Sweden?
- 7.6, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Sweden rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 51st and Sweden ranks 52nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.