Georgia vs Serbia: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Georgia
3.3
in 2024
Serbia
3.85
in 2024
Georgia rank
110th
Serbia rank
109th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 3.85 against 3.3 in Georgia, a difference of 0.55.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 110th and Serbia ranks 109th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.74 | 0.9387 | 0.7974 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 8.28 | 13.63 | 5.35 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 3.85 against 3.3 in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Georgia and Serbia?
- 0.55, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Georgia ranks 110th and Serbia ranks 109th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.