Kazakhstan vs Southern Africa: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Kazakhstan
555.89
in 2024
Southern Africa
105.43
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
16th
Southern Africa rank
13th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 555.89 against 105.43 in Southern Africa, a difference of 450.46.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 5.3 times Southern Africa's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 16th and Southern Africa ranks 13th of 201 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 332.33 | 72.92 | 259.41 | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 770.76 | 89.83 | 680.93 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Kazakhstan or Southern Africa?
- Kazakhstan, at 555.89 against 105.43 in Southern Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Kazakhstan and Southern Africa?
- 450.46, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Southern Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Southern Africa rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 16th and Southern Africa ranks 13th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.