Malaysia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Malaysia
232.96
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa
12.82
in 2024
Malaysia rank
29th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
30th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Malaysia
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 232.96 against 12.82 in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 220.14.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 18.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 29th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 30th of 201 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 118.68 | 16 | 102.68 | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 181.66 | 15.54 | 166.12 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Malaysia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Malaysia, at 232.96 against 12.82 in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Malaysia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 220.14, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Malaysia ranks 29th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 30th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.