Maldives vs Tunisia: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Maldives
24.61
in 2024
Tunisia
21.65
in 2024
Maldives rank
81st
Tunisia rank
84th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Maldives
- Tunisia
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 24.61 against 21.65 in Tunisia, a difference of 2.96.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Tunisia ahead.
Maldives ranks 81st and Tunisia ranks 84th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4625 | 48.9 | 48.43 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 20.23 | 19.29 | 0.9398 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Maldives or Tunisia?
- Maldives, at 24.61 against 21.65 in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Maldives and Tunisia?
- 2.96, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Tunisia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Maldives and Tunisia rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Maldives ranks 81st and Tunisia ranks 84th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.