Malta vs New Zealand: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Malta
17.81
in 2023
New Zealand
18.04
in 2024
Malta rank
86th
New Zealand rank
85th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Malta
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 18.04 against 17.81 in Malta, a difference of 0.23.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 86th and New Zealand ranks 85th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.54 | 19.52 | 3.02 | Malta |
| 2020s | 19.75 | 64.44 | 44.7 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Malta or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 18.04 against 17.81 in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Malta and New Zealand?
- 0.23, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Malta and New Zealand rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Malta ranks 86th and New Zealand ranks 85th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.