Republic of Moldova vs Slovenia: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Republic of Moldova
76.7
in 2024
Slovenia
85.2
in 2023
Republic of Moldova rank
58th
Slovenia rank
56th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 85.2 against 76.7 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 8.5.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 58th and Slovenia ranks 56th of 201 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.03 | 79.14 | 67.11 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 36.04 | 71.76 | 35.72 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Republic of Moldova or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 85.2 against 76.7 in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Republic of Moldova and Slovenia?
- 8.5, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Slovenia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Slovenia rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 58th and Slovenia ranks 56th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.