Pakistan vs Suriname: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Pakistan
28.98
in 2024
Suriname
30.48
in 2024
Pakistan rank
76th
Suriname rank
74th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Pakistan
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 30.48 against 28.98 in Pakistan, a difference of 1.5.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 76th and Suriname ranks 74th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 29.38 | 68.92 | 39.54 | Suriname |
| 2020s | 42.44 | 29.94 | 12.51 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Pakistan or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 30.48 against 28.98 in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Pakistan and Suriname?
- 1.5, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Suriname?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Suriname rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Pakistan ranks 76th and Suriname ranks 74th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.