Serbia vs Zimbabwe: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Serbia
3.85
in 2024
Zimbabwe
3.19
in 2024
Serbia rank
109th
Zimbabwe rank
111th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Serbia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 3.85 against 3.19 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.66.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Serbia ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.9387 | 85.74 | 84.8 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 13.63 | 1.61 | 12.01 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Serbia or Zimbabwe?
- Serbia, at 3.85 against 3.19 in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.66, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Zimbabwe rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Serbia ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.