Saint Lucia vs Zimbabwe: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita
Saint Lucia
2.72
in 2024
Zimbabwe
3.19
in 2024
Saint Lucia rank
112th
Zimbabwe rank
111th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita over time
- Saint Lucia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 3.19 against 2.72 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.47.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.81 | 85.74 | 83.93 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 2.73 | 1.61 | 1.12 | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita, Saint Lucia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 3.19 against 2.72 in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita between Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.47, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita?
- Saint Lucia ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.