Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Fossil-fuel subsidies

Mauritius
50.00 million billions of current united states dollars
in 2022
Zimbabwe
50.00 million billions of current united states dollars
in 2024
Mauritius rank
84th
Zimbabwe rank
84th

Fossil-fuel subsidies over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zimbabwe
01.0B2.0B3.0B201020172024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 50.00 million billions of current united states dollars against 50.00 million billions of current united states dollars in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 billions of current united states dollars.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mauritius ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 189 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 14.44 million billions of current united states dollars 1.32 billion billions of current united states dollars 1.30 billion billions of current united states dollars Zimbabwe
2020s 30.00 million billions of current united states dollars 3.33 million billions of current united states dollars 26.67 million billions of current united states dollars Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
Mauritius, at 50.00 million billions of current united states dollars against 50.00 million billions of current united states dollars in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
0 billions of current united states dollars, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies?
Mauritius ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Environment Programme – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Fossil-fuel subsidies. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Environment Programme – with minor processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-subsidies/mauritius/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-subsidies/mauritius/zimbabwe/">Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Fossil-fuel subsidies</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil-fuel subsidies
Unit
billions of current united states dollars
Source
United Nations Environment Programme – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
189 places, 2,644 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed

Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars).