Lithuania vs South Africa: Fossil Fuel Support - Detailed Indicators
Fossil Fuel Support - Detailed Indicators over time
- Lithuania
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 2.31 Percentage of GDP against 0.7351 Percentage of GDP in Lithuania, a difference of 1.57 Percentage of GDP.
That makes South Africa's figure about 3.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Lithuania ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 12 groups.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5779 Percentage of GDP | 0.8514 Percentage of GDP | 0.2735 Percentage of GDP | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.9619 Percentage of GDP | 1.52 Percentage of GDP | 0.5603 Percentage of GDP | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel support - detailed indicators, Lithuania or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 2.31 Percentage of GDP against 0.7351 Percentage of GDP in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel support - detailed indicators between Lithuania and South Africa?
- 1.57 Percentage of GDP, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and South Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and South Africa rank globally for fossil fuel support - detailed indicators?
- Lithuania ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 3rd of 12 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Fossil Fuel Support - Detailed Indicators. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Methodology: https://www.oecd.org/fossil-fuels/methodology/: National Data: http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/fileview2.aspx?IDFile81561a30-0f52-4c7b-8946-9eeb28e73f01 OECD Fossil Fuel Support Portal: https://www.oecd.org/fossil-fuels/ Contact: ffs.contact@oecd.org Source: OECD Companion to the Inventory of Support Measures for Fossil Fuels 2021 Last updated: December 2025, annual data. Data for 2024 are preliminary and may contain OECD-generated estimates. Key statistical concept: PSE: Producer Support Estimate GSSE: General Services Support Estimate CSE: Consumer Support Estimate EXTRACT: Extraction or mining stage TRANS: Transportation of fossil fuels (e.g., through pipelines) REFIN: Refining or processing stage GENER: Use of fossil fuels in ectricity generation INDUS: Use of fossil fuels in the industrial sector END: Other end uses of fossil fuels consumption: Direct consumption returns: Output Returns income: Enterprise Income inputs: Cost of Intermediate Inputs labour: Labour land: Land and natural resources Other comments: 1) Fiscal cost of support measures for fossil fuels are based on information reported by countries through official documentation (e.g. budget reports). Support measures for which such information is not available are excluded from the aggregate amount reported in this table. In addition, support measures in certain countries may not have been exhaustively identified. 2) Tax expenditures are estimates of revenue that is foregone due to a particular feature of the tax system that reduces or postpones tax payments (relative to a jurisdiction’s benchmark tax system) to the benefit of fossil fuels’ producers or users. Hence, (i) tax expenditures estimates can increase either because of greater concessions (relative to the benchmark tax system) or because of an increase in the benchmark itself; (ii) cross-country comparisons of tax expenditures can be misleading due to country-specific benchmark tax systems. 3) Support measures for fossil fuels are included in the Inventory without reference to their economic or environmental effects. No judgment is therefore made as to whether such measures are inefficient or ought to be reformed.