Slovak Republic vs United Kingdom: Fossil Fuel Support - Detailed Indicators
Fossil Fuel Support - Detailed Indicators over time
- Slovak Republic
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 0.8916 Percentage of GDP against 0.6532 Percentage of GDP in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.2384 Percentage of GDP.
That makes Slovak Republic's figure about 1.4 times United Kingdom's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Slovak Republic ranks 4th and United Kingdom ranks 6th of 12 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Slovak Republic averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovak Republic | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3505 Percentage of GDP | 0.5836 Percentage of GDP | 0.2331 Percentage of GDP | United Kingdom |
| 2020s | 1.47 Percentage of GDP | 0.7635 Percentage of GDP | 0.7115 Percentage of GDP | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel support - detailed indicators, Slovak Republic or United Kingdom?
- Slovak Republic, at 0.8916 Percentage of GDP against 0.6532 Percentage of GDP in United Kingdom as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel support - detailed indicators between Slovak Republic and United Kingdom?
- 0.2384 Percentage of GDP, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovak Republic and United Kingdom?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Slovak Republic and United Kingdom rank globally for fossil fuel support - detailed indicators?
- Slovak Republic ranks 4th and United Kingdom ranks 6th of 12 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Fossil Fuel Support - Detailed Indicators. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Methodology: https://www.oecd.org/fossil-fuels/methodology/: National Data: http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/fileview2.aspx?IDFile81561a30-0f52-4c7b-8946-9eeb28e73f01 OECD Fossil Fuel Support Portal: https://www.oecd.org/fossil-fuels/ Contact: ffs.contact@oecd.org Source: OECD Companion to the Inventory of Support Measures for Fossil Fuels 2021 Last updated: December 2025, annual data. Data for 2024 are preliminary and may contain OECD-generated estimates. Key statistical concept: PSE: Producer Support Estimate GSSE: General Services Support Estimate CSE: Consumer Support Estimate EXTRACT: Extraction or mining stage TRANS: Transportation of fossil fuels (e.g., through pipelines) REFIN: Refining or processing stage GENER: Use of fossil fuels in ectricity generation INDUS: Use of fossil fuels in the industrial sector END: Other end uses of fossil fuels consumption: Direct consumption returns: Output Returns income: Enterprise Income inputs: Cost of Intermediate Inputs labour: Labour land: Land and natural resources Other comments: 1) Fiscal cost of support measures for fossil fuels are based on information reported by countries through official documentation (e.g. budget reports). Support measures for which such information is not available are excluded from the aggregate amount reported in this table. In addition, support measures in certain countries may not have been exhaustively identified. 2) Tax expenditures are estimates of revenue that is foregone due to a particular feature of the tax system that reduces or postpones tax payments (relative to a jurisdiction’s benchmark tax system) to the benefit of fossil fuels’ producers or users. Hence, (i) tax expenditures estimates can increase either because of greater concessions (relative to the benchmark tax system) or because of an increase in the benchmark itself; (ii) cross-country comparisons of tax expenditures can be misleading due to country-specific benchmark tax systems. 3) Support measures for fossil fuels are included in the Inventory without reference to their economic or environmental effects. No judgment is therefore made as to whether such measures are inefficient or ought to be reformed.