Hong Kong, China vs South Africa: Fossil fuel supply by source

Hong Kong, China
52.53 terawatt-hours
in 2025
South Africa
46.81 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
56th
South Africa rank
58th

Fossil fuel supply by source over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • South Africa
0204060196519952025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 52.53 terawatt-hours against 46.81 terawatt-hours in South Africa, a difference of 5.72 terawatt-hours.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 56th and South Africa ranks 58th of 77 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 21.8 terawatt-hours 10.93 terawatt-hours 10.88 terawatt-hours Hong Kong, China
2000s 26.3 terawatt-hours 25.64 terawatt-hours 0.6661 terawatt-hours Hong Kong, China
2010s 29.39 terawatt-hours 41.77 terawatt-hours 12.38 terawatt-hours South Africa
2020s 49.71 terawatt-hours 44.39 terawatt-hours 5.32 terawatt-hours Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel supply by source, Hong Kong, China or South Africa?
Hong Kong, China, at 52.53 terawatt-hours against 46.81 terawatt-hours in South Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in fossil fuel supply by source between Hong Kong, China and South Africa?
5.72 terawatt-hours, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and South Africa?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and South Africa rank globally for fossil fuel supply by source?
Hong Kong, China ranks 56th and South Africa ranks 58th of 77 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel supply by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs South Africa: Fossil fuel supply by source. Statizoid, drawing on Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/global-fossil-fuel-consumption/hong-kong-sar-china/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/global-fossil-fuel-consumption/hong-kong-sar-china/south-africa/">Hong Kong, China vs South Africa: Fossil fuel supply by source</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel supply by source
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
79 places, 4,176 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed

Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.