Denmark vs Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Hydropower generation by region

Denmark
0.0078 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Denmark rank
70th
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
72nd

Hydropower generation by region over time

  • Denmark
  • Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
00.010.020.030.04196519952025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 0.0078 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, a difference of 0.0078 terawatt-hours.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 70th and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 72nd of 80 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0238 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours 0.0238 terawatt-hours Denmark
1970s 0.0242 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours 0.0242 terawatt-hours Denmark
1980s 0.0307 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours 0.0307 terawatt-hours Denmark
1990s 0.0268 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours 0.0268 terawatt-hours Denmark
2000s 0.0224 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours 0.0224 terawatt-hours Denmark
2010s 0.017 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours 0.017 terawatt-hours Denmark
2020s 0.0164 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours 0.0164 terawatt-hours Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hydropower generation by region, Denmark or Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
Denmark, at 0.0078 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China as of 2025.
What is the difference in hydropower generation by region between Denmark and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
0.0078 terawatt-hours, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
53 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank globally for hydropower generation by region?
Denmark ranks 70th and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 72nd of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Hydropower generation by region. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Hydropower generation by region. Statizoid, drawing on Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/hydropower-generation-by-region/denmark/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/hydropower-generation-by-region/denmark/hong-kong-sar-china/">Denmark vs Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Hydropower generation by region</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hydropower generation by region
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
82 places, 4,425 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed

Figures are based on gross primary hydroelectric generation and do not account for cross-border electricity supply.