Kiribati vs Macao: Electricity generation from hydropower
Kiribati
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Macao
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Kiribati rank
154th
Macao rank
154th
Electricity generation from hydropower over time
- Kiribati
- Macao
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Macao, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 154th and Macao ranks 154th of 214 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from hydropower, Kiribati or Macao?
- Kiribati, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Macao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from hydropower between Kiribati and Macao?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Macao?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Macao rank globally for electricity generation from hydropower?
- Kiribati ranks 154th and Macao ranks 154th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from hydropower. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours.