Aruba vs Tokelau: Installed renewable electricity-generating capacity
Aruba
423.85
in 2024
Tokelau
413.01
in 2024
Aruba rank
74th
Tokelau rank
75th
Installed renewable electricity-generating capacity over time
- Aruba
- Tokelau
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 423.85 against 413.01 in Tokelau, a difference of 10.84.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tokelau ahead.
Aruba ranks 74th and Tokelau ranks 75th of 205 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Tokelau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.3 | 0 | 30.3 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 352.18 | 443.61 | 91.43 | Tokelau |
| 2020s | 417.71 | 450.5 | 32.79 | Tokelau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher installed renewable electricity-generating capacity, Aruba or Tokelau?
- Aruba, at 423.85 against 413.01 in Tokelau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in installed renewable electricity-generating capacity between Aruba and Tokelau?
- 10.84, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Tokelau?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Tokelau rank globally for installed renewable electricity-generating capacity?
- Aruba ranks 74th and Tokelau ranks 75th of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Installed renewable electricity-generating capacity (watts per capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.