South Sudan vs Sri Lanka: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per capita
South Sudan
0 units per person
in 2022
Sri Lanka
0 units per person
in 2022
South Sudan rank
94th
Sri Lanka rank
93rd
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per capita over time
- South Sudan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
South Sudan ranks 94th and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per capita, South Sudan or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in South Sudan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per capita between South Sudan and Sri Lanka?
- 0 units per person, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Sri Lanka?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do South Sudan and Sri Lanka rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per capita?
- South Sudan ranks 94th and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.