China vs Estonia: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square

China
0.0003 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Estonia
0.0003 units per square kilometre
in 2022
China rank
91st
Estonia rank
92nd

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square over time

  • China
  • Estonia
0000196119912022

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0003 units per square kilometre against 0.0003 units per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

China ranks 91st and Estonia ranks 92nd of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Estonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre China
2020s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square, China or Estonia?
China, at 0.0003 units per square kilometre against 0.0003 units per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2022.
What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square between China and Estonia?
0 units per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Estonia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do China and Estonia rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square?
China ranks 91st and Estonia ranks 92nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Estonia: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-square-kilometre/china/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-square-kilometre/china/estonia/">China vs Estonia: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,389 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.