China vs United States of America: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square

China
0.0003 units per square kilometre
in 2022
United States of America
0.0003 units per square kilometre
in 2022
China rank
91st
United States of America rank
89th

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square over time

  • China
  • United States of America
0000196119912022

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 0.0003 units per square kilometre against 0.0003 units per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

Across all 62 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

China ranks 91st and United States of America ranks 89th of 183 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States of America
1970s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States of America
1980s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States of America
1990s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States of America
2000s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States of America
2010s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States of America
2020s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square, China or United States of America?
United States of America, at 0.0003 units per square kilometre against 0.0003 units per square kilometre in China as of 2022.
What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square between China and United States of America?
0 units per square kilometre, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and United States of America?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do China and United States of America rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square?
China ranks 91st and United States of America ranks 89th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs United States of America: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-square-kilometre/china/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-square-kilometre/china/united-states/">China vs United States of America: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,389 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.