Democratic Republic of Congo vs Sweden: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.0004 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Sweden
0.0004 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
79th
Sweden rank
77th

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Sweden
00000196119912022

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0004 units per square kilometre against 0.0004 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 79th and Sweden ranks 77th of 183 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square, Democratic Republic of Congo or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.0004 units per square kilometre against 0.0004 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2022.
What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square between Democratic Republic of Congo and Sweden?
0 units per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Sweden?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Sweden rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 79th and Sweden ranks 77th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Sweden: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/sweden/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Sweden: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,389 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.