Congo vs South Korea: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square

Congo
0.0007 units per square kilometre
in 2022
South Korea
0.0007 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Congo rank
55th
South Korea rank
54th

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square over time

  • Congo
  • South Korea
0000.001196119912022

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 0.0007 units per square kilometre against 0.0007 units per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

Across all 62 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 55th and South Korea ranks 54th of 183 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo South Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Korea
1970s 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Korea
1980s 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Korea
1990s 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Korea
2000s 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Korea
2010s 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Korea
2020s 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square, Congo or South Korea?
South Korea, at 0.0007 units per square kilometre against 0.0007 units per square kilometre in Congo as of 2022.
What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square between Congo and South Korea?
0 units per square kilometre, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Korea?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Congo and South Korea rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square?
Congo ranks 55th and South Korea ranks 54th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs South Korea: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/korea-rep/">Congo vs South Korea: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,389 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.