Eswatini vs Palestine, State of: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square

Eswatini
0.0002 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Palestine, State of
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2021
Eswatini rank
122nd
Palestine, State of rank
124th

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Palestine, State of
0000196119912022

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Palestine, State of's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 122nd and Palestine, State of ranks 124th of 183 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square, Eswatini or Palestine, State of?
Eswatini, at 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Palestine, State of as of 2022.
What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square between Eswatini and Palestine, State of?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Palestine, State of?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2021.
How do Eswatini and Palestine, State of rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square?
Eswatini ranks 122nd and Palestine, State of ranks 124th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Palestine, State of: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/west-bank-and-gaza/">Eswatini vs Palestine, State of: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,389 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.