South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square

South Africa
0 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Zimbabwe
0 units per square kilometre
in 2022
South Africa rank
156th
Zimbabwe rank
159th

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
00000196119912022

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 183 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square, South Africa or Zimbabwe?
South Africa, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
0 units per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square?
South Africa ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 10,389 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.