Italy vs Sudan: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP
Italy
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Sudan
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Italy rank
142nd
Sudan rank
144th
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP over time
- Italy
- Sudan
How they compare
Italy currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Italy ranks 142nd and Sudan ranks 144th of 181 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of gdp, Italy or Sudan?
- Italy, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of gdp between Italy and Sudan?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Italy and Sudan rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of gdp?
- Italy ranks 142nd and Sudan ranks 144th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.