Philippines vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP

Philippines
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Tanzania, United Republic of
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Philippines rank
61st
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
64th

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP over time

  • Philippines
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
000000196119912022

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Philippines ahead.

Philippines ranks 61st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 64th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 4 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Philippines
1970s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Philippines
1980s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Philippines
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of gdp, Philippines or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Philippines, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2022.
What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of gdp between Philippines and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Tanzania, United Republic of?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Philippines and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of gdp?
Philippines ranks 61st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 64th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-unit-of-gdp/philippines/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-unit-of-gdp/philippines/tanzania/">Philippines vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,645 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.