South Africa vs United States of America: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP

South Africa
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
United States of America
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
South Africa rank
132nd
United States of America rank
134th

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP over time

  • South Africa
  • United States of America
000000196119912022

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in United States of America, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United States of America ahead.

South Africa ranks 132nd and United States of America ranks 134th of 181 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP United States of America
1970s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP United States of America
1980s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP United States of America
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP United States of America
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP United States of America
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP United States of America
2020s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of gdp, South Africa or United States of America?
South Africa, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in United States of America as of 2022.
What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of gdp between South Africa and United States of America?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and United States of America?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do South Africa and United States of America rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of gdp?
South Africa ranks 132nd and United States of America ranks 134th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs United States of America: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-unit-of-gdp/south-africa/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region-per-unit-of-gdp/south-africa/united-states/">South Africa vs United States of America: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,645 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.