Bhutan vs North Korea: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region

Bhutan
78 billion cubic meters
in 2022
North Korea
67 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Bhutan rank
64th
North Korea rank
66th

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region over time

  • Bhutan
  • North Korea
020406080100196119912022

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 78 billion cubic meters against 67 billion cubic meters in North Korea, a difference of 11 billion cubic meters.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.2 times North Korea's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 64th and North Korea ranks 66th of 183 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan North Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 95 billion cubic meters 67 billion cubic meters 28 billion cubic meters Bhutan
1970s 95 billion cubic meters 67 billion cubic meters 28 billion cubic meters Bhutan
1980s 95 billion cubic meters 67 billion cubic meters 28 billion cubic meters Bhutan
1990s 86.6 billion cubic meters 67 billion cubic meters 19.6 billion cubic meters Bhutan
2000s 79.2 billion cubic meters 67 billion cubic meters 12.2 billion cubic meters Bhutan
2010s 78 billion cubic meters 67 billion cubic meters 11 billion cubic meters Bhutan
2020s 78 billion cubic meters 67 billion cubic meters 11 billion cubic meters Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, Bhutan or North Korea?
Bhutan, at 78 billion cubic meters against 67 billion cubic meters in North Korea as of 2022.
What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region between Bhutan and North Korea?
11 billion cubic meters, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and North Korea?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bhutan and North Korea rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region?
Bhutan ranks 64th and North Korea ranks 66th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs North Korea: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 26 October 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region/bhutan/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region/bhutan/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Bhutan vs North Korea: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region
Unit
billion cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 10,467 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources refers to the quantity of internal freshwater from inflowing river basins and recharging groundwater aquifers.