Cape Verde vs Singapore: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region

Cape Verde
0.3 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Singapore
0.6 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Cape Verde rank
168th
Singapore rank
165th

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Singapore
00.20.40.6196119912022

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.6 billion cubic meters against 0.3 billion cubic meters in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.3 billion cubic meters.

That makes Singapore's figure about 2.0 times Cape Verde's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 168th and Singapore ranks 165th of 183 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore
1970s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore
1980s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore
1990s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore
2000s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore
2010s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore
2020s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, Cape Verde or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.6 billion cubic meters against 0.3 billion cubic meters in Cape Verde as of 2022.
What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region between Cape Verde and Singapore?
0.3 billion cubic meters, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Singapore?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Cape Verde and Singapore rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region?
Cape Verde ranks 168th and Singapore ranks 165th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Singapore: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region/cabo-verde/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region/cabo-verde/singapore/">Cape Verde vs Singapore: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region
Unit
billion cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 10,467 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources refers to the quantity of internal freshwater from inflowing river basins and recharging groundwater aquifers.