Ecuador vs Malaysia: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region
Ecuador
442.4
in 2022
Malaysia
580
in 2022
Ecuador rank
18th
Malaysia rank
15th
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region over time
- Ecuador
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 580 against 442.4 in Ecuador, a difference of 137.6.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.
Across all 62 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 18th and Malaysia ranks 15th of 183 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 442.4 | 580 | 137.6 | Malaysia |
| 1970s | 442.4 | 580 | 137.6 | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 442.4 | 580 | 137.6 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 442.4 | 580 | 137.6 | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 442.4 | 580 | 137.6 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 442.4 | 580 | 137.6 | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 442.4 | 580 | 137.6 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, Ecuador or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 580 against 442.4 in Ecuador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region between Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 137.6, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region?
- Ecuador ranks 18th and Malaysia ranks 15th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.