Romania vs South Africa: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region

Romania
42.38 billion cubic meters
in 2022
South Africa
44.8 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Romania rank
83rd
South Africa rank
81st

Internal renewable freshwater resources by region over time

  • Romania
  • South Africa
010203040196119912022

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 44.8 billion cubic meters against 42.38 billion cubic meters in Romania, a difference of 2.42 billion cubic meters.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Romania ranks 83rd and South Africa ranks 81st of 183 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 42.38 billion cubic meters 44.8 billion cubic meters 2.42 billion cubic meters South Africa
1970s 42.38 billion cubic meters 44.8 billion cubic meters 2.42 billion cubic meters South Africa
1980s 42.38 billion cubic meters 44.8 billion cubic meters 2.42 billion cubic meters South Africa
1990s 42.38 billion cubic meters 44.8 billion cubic meters 2.42 billion cubic meters South Africa
2000s 42.38 billion cubic meters 44.8 billion cubic meters 2.42 billion cubic meters South Africa
2010s 42.38 billion cubic meters 44.8 billion cubic meters 2.42 billion cubic meters South Africa
2020s 42.38 billion cubic meters 44.8 billion cubic meters 2.42 billion cubic meters South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internal renewable freshwater resources by region, Romania or South Africa?
South Africa, at 44.8 billion cubic meters against 42.38 billion cubic meters in Romania as of 2022.
What is the difference in internal renewable freshwater resources by region between Romania and South Africa?
2.42 billion cubic meters, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Africa?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Romania and South Africa rank globally for internal renewable freshwater resources by region?
Romania ranks 83rd and South Africa ranks 81st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Internal renewable freshwater resources by region. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs South Africa: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region/romania/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/internal-renewable-freshwater-resources-by-region/romania/south-africa/">Romania vs South Africa: Internal renewable freshwater resources by region</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internal renewable freshwater resources by region
Unit
billion cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 10,467 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources refers to the quantity of internal freshwater from inflowing river basins and recharging groundwater aquifers.