Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: International financial flows to developing countries in support of

Kiribati
23.47 million constant US$
in 2024
Zimbabwe
21.43 million constant US$
in 2024
Kiribati rank
82nd
Zimbabwe rank
84th

International financial flows to developing countries in support of over time

  • Kiribati
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300200020122024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 23.47 million constant US$ against 21.43 million constant US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.04 million constant US$.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Kiribati ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 158 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 0.578 million constant US$ 0.095 million constant US$ 0.483 million constant US$ Kiribati
2010s 1.21 million constant US$ 35.88 million constant US$ 34.67 million constant US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 7.48 million constant US$ 5.23 million constant US$ 2.24 million constant US$ Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher international financial flows to developing countries in support of, Kiribati or Zimbabwe?
Kiribati, at 23.47 million constant US$ against 21.43 million constant US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in international financial flows to developing countries in support of between Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
2.04 million constant US$, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Zimbabwe rank globally for international financial flows to developing countries in support of?
Kiribati ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as International financial flows to developing countries in support of clean energy research and development and renewable energy production, including in hybrid systems (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: International financial flows to developing countries in support of. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/international-financial-flows-to-developing-countries-in-support-of-clean-energy-research/kiribati/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/international-financial-flows-to-developing-countries-in-support-of-clean-energy-research/kiribati/zimbabwe/">Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: International financial flows to developing countries in support of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
International financial flows to developing countries in support of clean energy research and development and renewable energy production, including in hybrid systems (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)
Unit
million constant US$
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
188 places, 4,700 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed