Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Investment in energy with private participation

Belarus
11.30 million current US$
in 2019
Sri Lanka
8.32 million current US$
in 2023
Belarus rank
67th
Sri Lanka rank
68th

Investment in energy with private participation over time

  • Belarus
  • Sri Lanka
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B199520092023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 11.30 million current US$ against 8.32 million current US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 2.98 million current US$.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.4 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 67th and Sri Lanka ranks 68th of 70 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 500.00 million current US$ 63.00 million current US$ 437.00 million current US$ Belarus
2000s 625.00 million current US$ 44.45 million current US$ 580.55 million current US$ Belarus
2010s 1.56 billion current US$ 400.68 million current US$ 1.16 billion current US$ Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher investment in energy with private participation, Belarus or Sri Lanka?
Belarus, at 11.30 million current US$ against 8.32 million current US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
What is the difference in investment in energy with private participation between Belarus and Sri Lanka?
2.98 million current US$, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sri Lanka?
6 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Belarus and Sri Lanka rank globally for investment in energy with private participation?
Belarus ranks 67th and Sri Lanka ranks 68th of 70 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database, World Bank (WB), published as Investment in energy with private participation (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Investment in energy with private participation. Statizoid, drawing on Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/investment-in-energy-with-private-participation-current-us/belarus/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/investment-in-energy-with-private-participation-current-us/belarus/sri-lanka/">Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Investment in energy with private participation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Investment in energy with private participation (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
88 places, 1,515 data points, 1984–2024
Last refreshed

The Private Participation in Infrastructure (PPI) Database records contractual arrangements for public infrastructure projects in low- and middle-income countries (as classified by the World Bank) that have reached financial closure, in which private parties assume operating risk. Investment in energy projects with private participation refers to commitments to infrastructure projects in energy (electricity and natural gas: generation, transmission and distribution) that have reached financial closure and directly or indirectly serve the public. The types of projects included are management and lease contracts, brownfield projects, greenfield projects (in which a private entity or a public-private joint venture builds and operates a new facility), and divestitures. Investments are classified as one of two types: (1) Investments in physical assets: resources the project company commits to invest in expanding and modernizing facilities and (2) payments to the government: to acquire state-owned enterprises or rights to provide services in a specific area or to use radio spectrum. Data is presented based on investment year. Data are in current U.S. dollars.