Belgium vs Latvia: Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2
Belgium
147,894 Terajoule
in 2023
Latvia
124,224 Terajoule
in 2023
Belgium rank
30th
Latvia rank
33rd
Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2 over time
- Belgium
- Latvia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 147,894 Terajoule against 124,224 Terajoule in Latvia, a difference of 23,670 Terajoule.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Latvia ahead.
Belgium ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 33rd of 41 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 88,736 Terajoule | 90,492 Terajoule | 1,756 Terajoule | Latvia |
| 2020s | 134,764 Terajoule | 114,832 Terajoule | 19,931 Terajoule | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2, Belgium or Latvia?
- Belgium, at 147,894 Terajoule against 124,224 Terajoule in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2 between Belgium and Latvia?
- 23,670 Terajoule, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Latvia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Latvia rank globally for key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2?
- Belgium ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 33rd of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2 activity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.