Croatia vs Estonia: Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2
Croatia
148,790 Terajoule
in 2023
Estonia
191,579 Terajoule
in 2023
Croatia rank
28th
Estonia rank
26th
Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2 over time
- Croatia
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 191,579 Terajoule against 148,790 Terajoule in Croatia, a difference of 42,789 Terajoule.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.3 times Croatia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 28th and Estonia ranks 26th of 41 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 174,081 Terajoule | 224,987 Terajoule | 50,906 Terajoule | Estonia |
| 2020s | 148,527 Terajoule | 190,810 Terajoule | 42,283 Terajoule | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2, Croatia or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 191,579 Terajoule against 148,790 Terajoule in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2 between Croatia and Estonia?
- 42,789 Terajoule, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Estonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Estonia rank globally for key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2?
- Croatia ranks 28th and Estonia ranks 26th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2 activity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.