Croatia vs Switzerland: Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2
Croatia
148,790 Terajoule
in 2023
Switzerland
210,893 Terajoule
in 2022
Croatia rank
28th
Switzerland rank
25th
Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2 over time
- Croatia
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 210,893 Terajoule against 148,790 Terajoule in Croatia, a difference of 62,103 Terajoule.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.4 times Croatia's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 28th and Switzerland ranks 25th of 41 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 174,081 Terajoule | 209,527 Terajoule | 35,446 Terajoule | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 148,439 Terajoule | 224,391 Terajoule | 75,952 Terajoule | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2, Croatia or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 210,893 Terajoule against 148,790 Terajoule in Croatia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2 between Croatia and Switzerland?
- 62,103 Terajoule, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Switzerland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2022.
- How do Croatia and Switzerland rank globally for key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2?
- Croatia ranks 28th and Switzerland ranks 25th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2 activity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.