Iceland vs Switzerland: Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2
Iceland
224,938 Terajoule
in 2023
Switzerland
210,893 Terajoule
in 2022
Iceland rank
23rd
Switzerland rank
25th
Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2 over time
- Iceland
- Switzerland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 224,938 Terajoule against 210,893 Terajoule in Switzerland, a difference of 14,045 Terajoule.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Switzerland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 23rd and Switzerland ranks 25th of 41 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 212,018 Terajoule | 209,527 Terajoule | 2,491 Terajoule | Iceland |
| 2020s | 220,088 Terajoule | 224,391 Terajoule | 4,303 Terajoule | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2, Iceland or Switzerland?
- Iceland, at 224,938 Terajoule against 210,893 Terajoule in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2 between Iceland and Switzerland?
- 14,045 Terajoule, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Switzerland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2022.
- How do Iceland and Switzerland rank globally for key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2?
- Iceland ranks 23rd and Switzerland ranks 25th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2 activity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.