Ireland vs Latvia: Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2
Ireland
104,089 Terajoule
in 2023
Latvia
124,224 Terajoule
in 2023
Ireland rank
35th
Latvia rank
33rd
Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2 over time
- Ireland
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 124,224 Terajoule against 104,089 Terajoule in Ireland, a difference of 20,135 Terajoule.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Latvia ahead.
Ireland ranks 35th and Latvia ranks 33rd of 41 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 142,488 Terajoule | 97,373 Terajoule | 45,115 Terajoule | Ireland |
| 2020s | 113,407 Terajoule | 114,832 Terajoule | 1,426 Terajoule | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2, Ireland or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 124,224 Terajoule against 104,089 Terajoule in Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2 between Ireland and Latvia?
- 20,135 Terajoule, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Latvia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Ireland and Latvia rank globally for key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by nace rev. 2?
- Ireland ranks 35th and Latvia ranks 33rd of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Key indicators of physical energy flow accounts by NACE Rev. 2 activity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.