Chile vs Latvia: Electricity generation from nuclear
Chile
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Latvia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Chile rank
33rd
Latvia rank
33rd
Electricity generation from nuclear over time
- Chile
- Latvia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Latvia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 33rd and Latvia ranks 33rd of 208 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from nuclear, Chile or Latvia?
- Chile, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from nuclear between Chile and Latvia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for electricity generation from nuclear?
- Chile ranks 33rd and Latvia ranks 33rd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours.